BrowserAct just turned browser agents into an infra bill
BrowserAct’s pricing page now centers on pay-as-you-go browser infrastructure, with free-trial tiers removed and new paid tiers for local fingerprint browsers, proxies, workflow steps, and cloud browsers. That lands alongside Devin pushing further into Security Swarm, PR review, visual QA, DeepWiki documentation, migrations, scheduled chores, and incident triage, while AutoGen’s README now says the project is in maintenance mode and community managed. Taken together, the check today is simple: if you’re buying or building agent workflows, you now have to separate platform cost, product scope, and project lifecycle before you commit.
See what changed on BrowserAct's listing →
What changed on the ground
Changes we detected on each tool's own pages — pricing, features, platform reach — via our daily crawls. Often ahead of any press coverage; each links to the scored listing.
|
13/36 · Adaptive Collaborator
AutoGen enters maintenance mode and points new users to Microsoft Agent… — The AutoGen README was updated to say the project is now in maintenance mode, will not receive new features, and is community managed going forward.
Source: the tool's own site — detected 2026-08-22 by agentic.ai's daily recrawl.
|
|
14/36 · Adaptive Collaborator
BrowserAct overhauls pricing with pay-as-you-go browser infrastructure tiers… — BrowserAct’s pricing page now centers on infrastructure services priced by credit usage, with free-trial tiers removed and new paid tiers added for local fingerprint browsers, proxies, workflow steps, and cloud browsers.
Source: the tool's own site — detected 2026-08-23 by agentic.ai's daily recrawl.
|
|
13/36 · Adaptive Collaborator
Webify.AI pivots from chatbot positioning to a broader enterprise AI agents… — The site now positions Webify.AI around pre-trained enterprise AI agents rather than a simple chatbot, with new industry category pages, expanded bot-store links, and a pricing model that shifts to usage-based billing tied to conversations…
Source: the tool's own site — detected 2026-08-23 by agentic.ai's daily recrawl.
|
|
9/36 · Guided Assistant
Beautiful.ai launches verified Claude connector built on MCP — Beautiful.ai added a new Claude integration that lets users generate presentation drafts from prompts in Claude, search their Beautiful.ai content, and continue editing in Beautiful.ai.
Source: the tool's own site — detected 2026-08-23 by agentic.ai's daily recrawl.
|
|
17/36 · Adaptive Collaborator
Devin adds Security Swarm and broadens its product suite across review… — The Devin homepage now prominently introduces Security Swarm and expands the listed use cases to include PR review and visual QA, documentation via DeepWiki, code migration and refactors, scheduled chores, incident triage, and broader auto…
Source: the tool's own site — detected 2026-08-22 by agentic.ai's daily recrawl.
|
|
10/36 · Guided Assistant
UiPath updates its plans and pricing with a revised tier breakdown… — UiPath made a broad pricing-page update, rewriting the Basic, Standard, and Enterprise tier descriptions and refreshing the comparison table.
Source: the tool's own site — detected 2026-08-22 by agentic.ai's daily recrawl.
|
From Agentic-News.ai
Agentic-AI industry signal we're tracking — launches, releases, and research from across the ecosystem. The directory rubric hasn't scored these yet; awareness now, evaluation next pass.
|
Nuggets
product launch
Nuggets has launched the Authority Control Plane, or ACP, a governance layer for autonomous AI agents in enterprise systems. The company says the product is available now as more firms move agents from demos into real workflows. For those tracking agentic AI, this signals a push to control what agents are allowed to do, not just who they are. Nuggets says identity tools can log agent actions, but ACP is meant to sit in the execution path and block risky ones.
Via Agentic-News.ai — The Fintech Times. Read: https://thefintechtimes.com/nuggets-launches-authority-control-plane-for-autonomous-ai-agents
|
Agenticness Leaderboard
This week's most-clicked tools, re-ranked by rubric score. The score is the editorial signal; the popularity is what drew the directory's traffic here this week.
GitHub Copilot helps you write, review, and adapt code directly in GitHub, your IDE, and the terminal. It supports everything from inline suggestions to agentic coding workflows with broader model choices and enterprise controls.
- Cursor · 18/36 · Adaptive Collaborator · L2
Cursor is a developer-focused AI environment that adds agents, context, and automation around your repositories. It combines an editor-like interface, a CLI, and a cloud agent API to automate code review, bug fixing, CI hygiene, and more. Designed for individual developers and engineering teams who want AI to take real actions in their code and infrastructure, not just chat.
- Cline · 18/36 · Adaptive Collaborator · L2
Cline is an AI coding assistant for VS Code that can inspect your project, edit files, run terminal commands, and use a browser while asking for permission at each step. It is aimed at developers working on real codebases who want more than code completion.
Codex CLI is OpenAI’s coding agent that runs on your computer from the terminal. It can also be used in VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, or as a desktop app.
- Req2Ops · 4/36 · Reactive Tool · L0
Req2Ops turns client briefs, emails, and PDFs into structured project plans. It helps teams capture missing details, organize work, and identify next actions before development starts.
What operators are searching for this week
A week's demand signal — what operators are typing into the directory's search. Suggestion-chip defaults + off-topic / greetings filtered.
- "best coding agent"
- "AI for customer support"
- "meilleur agent de codage"
- "a ai agent should join and understand in a meeting teams."
- "AI agent to triage and reply to my email inbox"
Learn: Action Capability: can it actually DO things (run code, send, edit files), or only suggest?
Action Capability is about whether a tool can take real actions in the world, not just talk about them. A system that drafts an email or writes code in a chat box is still only suggesting. A stronger agent can send that email, edit a file, run a command, or call an API on its own. That gap is what separates a real agent from a chatbot with a nice wrapper.
One concrete check: look for an action log or tool history showing actual side effects. If the product says it can book, send, or change something, see whether it shows the exact action, the target, and a confirmation after execution. If it can only produce instructions for you to copy, its Action Capability is low.
How our 9-dimension rubric works →
One tool worth testing
Today's signal didn't produce a clear single-tool pick worth a test session. Tomorrow's read picks it back up.
Our pick: Claude Code
The use case: coding agents.
Tops our independent /36 — the tiebreaker over Cursor: Continuity 3 vs 1. Pricing: Per-seat (usage per member, NOT pooled).
Ranked by our 9-dimension Agenticness rubric — not by who pays us (nobody does). The full scorecard, true-cost pricing, and the reliability evidence behind every score are in the report.
Read the full report →
|